JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 30, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Improcedencia para el caso
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-025/04 da respuesta a la solicitud de revocatoria del Auto 095/17, mediante el cual se negó la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato en contra de los Directores Generales del Departamento para la Prosperidad Social y la Unidad para las Víctimas, por el presunto incumplimiento a las órdenes dictadas en la Sentencia SU.254/13.

Se NIEGA, por improcedente, la solicitud formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. NEGAR por improcedente la solicitud formulada por Jaime Enrique Castro Flórez, de acuerdo con lo expuesto en la presente providencia. De igual forma, infórmese al peticionario lo resuelto en este auto.
  2. Cúmplase,
  3. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  4. Magistrada Presidenta
  5. Sala Especial de Seguimiento Sentencia T-025 De 2004
  6. ROCÍO LOAIZA MILIÁN
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.